(FILES) This illustration photo shows the Apple app store logo reflected from an iPhone onto the back of an iMac in Los Angeles, August 26, 2021. Did US tech giant Apple abuse the dominant position of its app store in the UK? A trial opening Monday, January 13, in which plaintiffs want more than one billion pounds is set to answer that question. (Photo by Chris DELMAS / AFP)
London, United Kingdom — Did US tech giant Apple abuse the dominant position of its app store in the UK? A trial opening Monday in which plaintiffs want more than one billion pounds is set to answer that question.
The complaint, filed in May 2021, accuses Apple of breaching European and UK competition laws by “its exclusion of any other app stores from iOS devices” like iPhones and iPads.
Article continues after this advertisementIt claims that some 20 million Apple users may have been overcharged by the company “due to its ban on rival app store platforms”.
FEATURED STORIES BUSINESS PDIC to hike bank deposit protection BUSINESS MVP Group inks 25-year Camp John Hay lease, BCDA’s first BUSINESS BIZ BUZZ: Antonios go to WashingtonREAD: Apple wants to keep diversity programs disavowed by other US firms
The complainants says a “30 percent surcharge” that the company “imposes” on apps purchased through Apple’s App Store comes at “expense of ordinary consumers”.
Article continues after this advertisementThe case, which Apple has called “meritless”, has been brought by Kings College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co.
Article continues after this advertisementThe trial is set to last seven weeks at the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London.
Article continues after this advertisementAt the heart are accusations that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.
“The 30 percent surcharge relates to most of the applications that you’re going to be using when you’re downloading and making in-app purchases on the App Store,” Kent told AFP, citing dating platform Tinder as an example.
Article continues after this advertisementHowever, it does not apply to applications offering physical products such as the delivery services Deliveroo and Uber Eats, the academic specifies.
Any user who purchased applications or subscriptions in the British version of the App Store between October 1, 2015 and November 15, 2024 may be entitled to compensation from Apple, believes Kent, a lecturer in the digital economy.
The claim seeks total estimated damages of £1.5 billion ($1.8 billion).
According to British law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.
EUWhen contacted by AFP, Apple referred to a 2022 statement, in which it said 85 percent of the applications on the App Store are free.
“We believe this lawsuit is meritless and welcome the opportunity to discuss with the court our unwavering commitment to consumers and the many benefits the App Store and Apple’s valuable technologies have delivered to the UK’s innovation economy,” the statement added.
The company also insists that the commission charged by the App Store is “very much in the mainstream of those charged by all other digital marketplaces”.
Investigations and complaints against Apple have multiplied around the world in recent years, particularly regarding its app store.
The American behemoth is the subject of another complaint worth £785 million (936 million euros) related to rates charged to app developers.
casino welcome bonus no depositLast June, the European Commission accused Apple of breaching its digital competition rules by preventing developers from “freely steering consumers to alternative channels” other than the App Store.
Apple then agreed to relax its rules, announcing in August that iPhone and iPad users in the European Union could delete the App Store and use competing platforms.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
“They’re responding to these investigations and also being told what to do. I don’t think they’re going to do it voluntarily, which I think is why it’s really important to bring these collective actions,” said Kent.
In its latest report, the BAI said the volume of imported meat inched up by 7.8 percent to 757.3 million kilograms in the first seven months of this year from 702.24 million kg in the same period a year ago.
Arthaland on Thursday said the capital infusion would be done via its subscription to 1807kplay,000 of the unissued preferred shares of Bhavya Properties Inc. for P100 each.
READ NEXT Billion-pound lawsuit against Apple over App Store opens in UK Taiwan iPhone maker Foxconn sets its sights on EV market EDITORS' PICK VP Duterte on INC peace rally: Powerful display of unity and faith Tito Sotto denies receiving ‘Pepsi Paloma’ movie script Tolentino to launch disaster relief LITAW program Double win for Lumad Basakanon in Sinulog sa Dakbayan 2025 LIST: Sinulog sa Dakbayan 2025 winners PNP: Active cops in P6.7-B drug mess now under restrictive custody MOST READ Rep. Co removed from House appropriations post; replacement pending INQToday: INC members call for peace between Sara Duterte, Bongbong Marcos LIVE UPDATES: INC National Rally for Peace INC peace rally: Lacuna supports Marcos opposition to VP impeachment Follow @FMangosingINQ on Twitter --> View comments